In re: Evan Scott Kagan

130 A.3d 951, 2014 WL 11149720
District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided November 26, 2014·No. 14-BG-1002·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the certified order suspending respondent from the practice of law in the state of Florida for 90 days, this court’s September 24, 2014, order directing respondent to show cause why reciprocal discipline should not be' imposed, and the statement of Bar Counsel'regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file a response to this court’s order to show cause but did file an. affidavit as required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) on October 16, 2014, it is

ORDERED that Evan Scott Kagan -is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for a period of 90 days, nunc pro tunc to October 16, 2014. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C. 2010), and In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C.2007).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Evan Scott Kagan, 130 A.3d 951, 2014 WL 11149720 (D.C. 2014).

130 A.3d 951 (In re: Evan Scott Kagan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Sibley
990 A.2d 483 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2010)
In Re Fuller
930 A.2d 194 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2007)