In re: Evan Scott Kagan

130 A.3d 951, 2014 WL 11149720
CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 26, 2014
Docket14-BG-1002
StatusPublished

This text of 130 A.3d 951 (In re: Evan Scott Kagan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re: Evan Scott Kagan, 130 A.3d 951, 2014 WL 11149720 (D.C. 2014).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the certified order suspending respondent from the practice of law in the state of Florida for 90 days, this court’s September 24, 2014, order directing respondent to show cause why reciprocal discipline should not be' imposed, and the statement of Bar Counsel'regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file a response to this court’s order to show cause but did file an. affidavit as required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) on October 16, 2014, it is

ORDERED that Evan Scott Kagan -is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for a period of 90 days, nunc pro tunc to October 16, 2014. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C. 2010), and In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C.2007).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Sibley
990 A.2d 483 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2010)
In Re Fuller
930 A.2d 194 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
130 A.3d 951, 2014 WL 11149720, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-evan-scott-kagan-dc-2014.