in Re: Evan Johnston and Adriana Akhtar
This text of in Re: Evan Johnston and Adriana Akhtar (in Re: Evan Johnston and Adriana Akhtar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISMISS and Opinion Filed November 2, 2022
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-01058-CV
IN RE EVAN JOHNSTON AND ADRIANA AKHTAR, Relators
Original Proceeding from the 14th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-21-00476
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Partida-Kipness, and Justice Smith Opinion by Chief Justice Burns Before the Court is relators’ motion to dismiss their mandamus petition.
Relators state the controversy described in their mandamus petition—a dispute over
discovery matters—has been mooted by the trial court’s final summary judgment
order disposing of their claims. See In re Alexis, No. 05-97-01916-CV, 1998 WL
564933, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas Sept. 8, 1998, orig. proceeding) (not designated
for publication) (“The entry of final judgment renders this mandamus dispute over
pre-trial discovery motions moot.”). Therefore, relators move to dismiss their
pending petition for mandamus relief. We grant relators’ motion and dismiss this original proceeding.
/Robert D. Burns, III/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
221058F.P05
–2–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Evan Johnston and Adriana Akhtar, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-evan-johnston-and-adriana-akhtar-texapp-2022.