in Re: Eugene X. Mercier
This text of in Re: Eugene X. Mercier (in Re: Eugene X. Mercier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
|
|
NUMBER 13-06-389-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
___________________________________________________________________
IN RE: EUGENE X. MERCIER
__________________________________________________________________
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Motion for Emergency Hearing
on Petition for Writ of Mandamus ___________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza
Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion[1]
Relator, Eugene X. Mercier, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on July 10, 2006. The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus, its record and its "clerk's record," is of the opinion that relator has not shown himself entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, relator's petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).
Furthermore, relator's motion for emergency hearing on petition for writ of mandamus filed on July 10, 2006, is also denied.
PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and
filed this 11th day of July, 2006.
[1] See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(d) (AWhen denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so.@); Tex. R. App. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Eugene X. Mercier, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-eugene-x-mercier-texapp-2006.