in Re Eugene Walter Hayenga and Cuatro T. Construction, Inc.
This text of in Re Eugene Walter Hayenga and Cuatro T. Construction, Inc. (in Re Eugene Walter Hayenga and Cuatro T. Construction, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas February 13, 2019
No. 04-19-00065-CV
IN RE Eugene Walter HAYENGA and Cuatro T. Construction, Inc.
Original Mandamus Proceeding 1
ORDER
On February 1, 2019, relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for emergency relief. On February 6, 2019, relators filed an unopposed motion to dismiss their petition and motion for emergency relief because the parties reached a settlement in this matter. We grant the motion to dismiss and dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus. The motion for emergency relief is denied as moot.
It is so ORDERED on February 13, 2019.
_____________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 13th day of February, 2019.
_____________________________ Keith E. Hottle, Clerk of Court
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 32595, styled Sarena A. Bautista v. Eugene Walter Hayenga and Cuatro T. Construction, Inc., pending in the 63rd Judicial District Court, Val Verde County, Texas, the Honorable Enrique Fernandez presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Eugene Walter Hayenga and Cuatro T. Construction, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-eugene-walter-hayenga-and-cuatro-t-construction-inc-texapp-2019.