in Re Eugene James Ellis
This text of in Re Eugene James Ellis (in Re Eugene James Ellis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed October 30, 2014.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-14-00839-CR
IN RE EUGENE JAMES ELLIS, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 337th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 9420695
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On October 20, 2014, relator Eugene James Ellis filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. Relator has not complied with the applicable procedural requirements. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.3, 52.7. Relator also has not satisfied his burden to demonstrate his entitlement to mandamus relief.
Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Jamison, and Donovan. Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Eugene James Ellis, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-eugene-james-ellis-texapp-2014.