Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/In re Euclid Concrete Corp.

In re Euclid Concrete Corp.

279 A.D. 594, 107 N.Y.S.2d 237, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3127
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 8, 1951
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 279 A.D. 594 (In re Euclid Concrete Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Euclid Concrete Corp., 279 A.D. 594, 107 N.Y.S.2d 237, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3127 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1951).

Opinion

The notice served by respondent failed to comply substantially with the requirements of section 59 of the Lien Law. It failed to require the lienor to commence an action to enforce the lien, within a time specified in the notice, not less than thirty days from the time of service of the notice and to require the lienor to show cause at Special Term at a time and place specified therein, why the notice of lien should not be vacated. (Matter of Drake Constr. Corp. [Kenn Equipment Co.], 274 App. Div. 809.) Carswell, Acting P. J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chessid v. Cirilla
15 A.D.2d 817 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
279 A.D. 594, 107 N.Y.S.2d 237, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-euclid-concrete-corp-nyappdiv-1951.