In re Etkin
This text of 271 A.D.2d 749 (In re Etkin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1956. He maintained a law office in Schenectady.
On February 28, 2000, respondent pleaded guilty to two felonies, bribing a witness (Penal Law § 215.00 [a]) and defrauding the government (Penal Law § 195.20). Pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (a), an attorney convicted of a criminal offense classified as a felony under the laws of this State shall cease to be an attorney upon such conviction. Respondent’s plea of guilty was equivalent to a conviction for attorney discipline purposes (see, e.g., Matter of Russell, 216 AD2d 790).
We therefore grant petitioner’s unopposed motion to strike respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys and disbar respondent, effective immediately.
Peters, J. P., Grajfeo, Mugglin, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that petitioner’s motion is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent’s name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and he is disbarred, effective immediately; and it is further ordered that respondent is commanded to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form, either as [750]*750principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another; and he is forbidden to appear as attorney and counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission or other public authority or to give to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto; and it is further ordered that respondent shall comply with the provisions of this Court’s rules (22 NYCRR 806.9) regulating the conduct of disbarred attorneys.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
271 A.D.2d 749, 706 N.Y.S.2d 917, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4240, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-etkin-nyappdiv-2000.