In re Estate Wilson

402 A.2d 197, 119 N.H. 425, 1979 N.H. LEXIS 308
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedMay 23, 1979
DocketNo. 79-033
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 402 A.2d 197 (In re Estate Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Estate Wilson, 402 A.2d 197, 119 N.H. 425, 1979 N.H. LEXIS 308 (N.H. 1979).

Opinion

Memorandum Opinion

This is an appeal from a decree of the Cheshire County Probate Court (Lichman, J.) denying admission to probate of a document purporting to be the will of Jean Fischer Wilson.

[426]*426Jean Fischer Wilson, at the time of her death on December 11,1977, was a resident of Fitzwilliam, New Hampshire. The document purporting to be her will was filed for probate on December 13,1977. It was attested by two witnesses and executed in the State of New Hampshire. The sole legatees under this purported will are the Smith College Alumnae Fund and two churches.

Roger H. Cole and David R. Cole, the first cousins of the decedent, are the only heirs at law and are entitled to the estate if the purported will is invalid. They seasonably objected to the allowance of the purported will on the grounds that it does not comply with the statute, RSA 551:2, which requires that a will be subscribed by three or more credible witnesses.

On June 27,1978, a hearing was held in the Cheshire County Probate Court to determine if the purported will should be admitted to probate. Following the hearing, the court ruled that the purported will could not be admitted to probate and that the estate was to be administered on an intestate basis. The exceptions of the protesting charities were reserved and transferred to this court.

The legatees under the will ask us to depart from the holding of In re Amor Estate, 99 N.H. 417, 112 A.2d 665 (1955), affirming the validity of our statutory three-witness requirement, RSA 551:2. They assert that New Hampshire is one of only four States that require three instead of two subscribing witnesses. That argument is for the legislature, which is the appropriate governmental body to amend or modify the statute as it deems appropriate.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Estate of Fischer
886 A.2d 996 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 2005)
In re Estate of Blais
583 A.2d 1275 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
402 A.2d 197, 119 N.H. 425, 1979 N.H. LEXIS 308, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-estate-wilson-nh-1979.