In re Estate of Young

Ohio Supreme Court

In re Estate of Young

174 Ohio St. (N.S.) 516

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 8, 1963·No. No. 37645·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The record discloses that.the claimant had actual notice of the decedent’s death in sufficient time to present his claim wdthin the statutory period. In such case, claimant is not entitled to the relief sought. Redifer Bus Co. v. Lumme, Admr., 171 Ohio St., 471; In re Estate of Marrs, 158 Ohio St., 95.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed.

Judgment reversed.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, 0 ’Neill, Griffith and - Gibson, JJ., concur. Herbert, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The record discloses that.the claimant had actual notice of the decedent’s death in sufficient time to present his claim wdthin the statutory period. In such case, claimant is not entitled to the relief sought. Redifer Bus Co. v. Lumme, Admr., 171 Ohio St., 471; In re Estate of Marrs, 158 Ohio St., 95.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed.

Judgment reversed.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, 0 ’Neill, Griffith and - Gibson, JJ., concur. Herbert, J., dissents.

In re Estate of Young, 174 Ohio St. (N.S.) 516 (Ohio 1963).

Pincite

174 Ohio St. (N.S.) 516 (In re Estate of Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.