In Re Estate of Wright and Wright v. . Ball

168 S.E. 666, 204 N.C. 494, 1933 N.C. LEXIS 173
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In Re Estate of Wright and Wright v. . Ball. Read the opinion of the Court — 200 N.C. 620
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided April 5, 1933·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The order in this cause, made by the judge presiding in the Superior Court of Durham County, is not reviewable by this Court. The petition was addressed to and the order was made by the judge, in his discretion. No matter of law or legal inference is involved in the petition or in the order. On the facts found by the judge, from the record and from affidavits filed by the petitioner and by the receiver, there was no abuse by the judge of his discretion. It is not so contended by the petitioner on her appeal to this Court. The appeal mus be

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Estate of Wright and Wright v. . Ball, 168 S.E. 666, 204 N.C. 494, 1933 N.C. LEXIS 173 (N.C. 1933).

168 S.E. 666 (In Re Estate of Wright and Wright v. . Ball) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Estate of Wright and Wright v. . Ball
158 S.E. 192 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1931)