In re Estate of Worstell

784 N.E.2d 708, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1474
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 5, 2003
Docket2002-1981
StatusPublished

This text of 784 N.E.2d 708 (In re Estate of Worstell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Estate of Worstell, 784 N.E.2d 708, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1474 (Ohio 2003).

Opinion

Montgomery App. No. 19133, 2002-Ohio-5385. Discretionary appeal allowed.

Moyek, C.J., Cook and O’Connor, JJ., dissent.

On motion for admission pro hac vice of Michael G. Lambros, Thomas J. Cullen, and Paul E. Nystrom by Joseph F. Murray. Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
784 N.E.2d 708, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1474, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-estate-of-worstell-ohio-2003.