In RE ESTATE OF WILLIE MAE JAMES A/K/A WILLIE MAE BROCKINGTON JAMES

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 2, 2022
DocketA22A0767
StatusPublished

This text of In RE ESTATE OF WILLIE MAE JAMES A/K/A WILLIE MAE BROCKINGTON JAMES (In RE ESTATE OF WILLIE MAE JAMES A/K/A WILLIE MAE BROCKINGTON JAMES) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In RE ESTATE OF WILLIE MAE JAMES A/K/A WILLIE MAE BROCKINGTON JAMES, (Ga. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ February 02, 2022

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A22A0767. IN RE ESTATE OF WILLIE MAE JAMES a/k/a WILLIE MAE BROCKINGTON JAMES.

David Jonathan James, the surviving spouse of decedent Willie Mae James, filed a petition for a year’s support in probate court. The decedent’s sons, Edward Brockington, Jr., and Tyrone E. Brockington (“the Brockingtons”), filed in the case a caveat to the year’s support petition and a petition to have the will probated. On July 2, 2021, the probate court granted David James’s petition for a year’s support. The Brockingtons appealed, and we dismissed the appeal as interlocutory because their petition to probate the will remained pending. (Case Number A22A0304, Nov. 9, 2021). On November 16, 2021, after the case was returned to the trial court, the Brockingtons filed a voluntary dismissal without prejudice of their probate petition, which was the only matter remaining in the case. On December 2, 2021, the Brockingtons filed this direct appeal from the order granting the petition for a year’s support. David James has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. We lack jurisdiction. “A notice of appeal must be filed from an appealable decision or judgment, OCGA § 5-6-38[.]. . .A voluntary dismissal is not a decision or judgment that may be appealed by a plaintiff.” Waye v. Continental Special Risks, Inc., 289 Ga. App. 82, 84 (656 SE2d 150) (2007); see also Studdard v. Satcher, Chick, Kapfer, Inc., 217 Ga. App. 1, 3 (456 SE2d 71) (1995); Mitchell v. Wyatt, 192 Ga. App. 127, 129 (1) (384 SE2d 227) (1989). This is so because “one cannot complain of a judgment, order, or ruling that his own procedure or conduct procured or aided in causing.” Studdard, 217 Ga. App. at 3 (punctuation omitted). Accordingly, a party cannot use its own voluntary dismissal as the vehicle for obtaining appellate review of rulings entered by the trial court more than 30 days before the filing of the notice of appeal. See Waye, 289 Ga. App. at 84; Studdard, 217 Ga. App. at 3. For these reasons, this Court is without jurisdiction to entertain this appeal. Therefore, the motion to dismiss is hereby GRANTED, and the appeal is DISMISSED. Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 02/02/2022 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mitchell v. Wyatt
384 S.E.2d 227 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1989)
Waye v. Continental Special Risks, Inc.
656 S.E.2d 150 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2007)
Studdard v. Satcher, Chick, Kapfer, Inc.
456 S.E.2d 71 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In RE ESTATE OF WILLIE MAE JAMES A/K/A WILLIE MAE BROCKINGTON JAMES, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-estate-of-willie-mae-james-aka-willie-mae-brockington-james-gactapp-2022.