In Re Estate of Walter N. Helveston

117 So. 334, 96 Fla. 390, 1928 Fla. LEXIS 861
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedAugust 1, 1928
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 117 So. 334 (In Re Estate of Walter N. Helveston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Estate of Walter N. Helveston, 117 So. 334, 96 Fla. 390, 1928 Fla. LEXIS 861 (Fla. 1928).

Opinion

Buford, J.

In this case a receiver was appointed by the Circuit Court of Charlotte County to take charge of, hold, manage and conduct the estate, property and assets of Walter N. Helveston. Later D. J. Hobbs filed a petition in that court to be allowed to intervene as a claimant holding a preferred claim against the estate of Walter N. Helveston, such claim being an alleged lien on certain property of Walter N. Helveston acquired by the furnishing of material and labor to construct certain improvements on such property and prayed for an adjudication of his claim against the receiver. At the same time D. J. Hobbs filed a petition praying an order of court allowing him to file independent suit in chancery to enforce his claim against the receiver by foreclosure of his lien. Both petitions were denied.

It appears from the record before us that the estate of Walter N. Helveston is in the hands of a receiver under the direction of the court. The petition of Hobbs to be allowed to intervene, taken together with the sworn statement thereto attached and sought to be filed, sets forth all essential allegations to show the existence of a statutory lien against the property described in the petition in favor of the petitioner. The court having assumed jurisdiction of the estate and having appointed a receiver, may direct the management and control of the estate and the settlement of lawful claims against the estate. The petition to intervene should have been granted. See Knickerbocker Trust Co. v. Green Bay Phosphate Co., 62 Fla. 519, 56 So. *392 R. 699; and Morgareidge v. Howey et al., 75 Fla. 234, 78 So. R. 14.

Order denying petitioner’s petition to intervene is reversed.

Whitfield, P. J. and Terrell, J., concur. Ellis, C. J. and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Helveston v. Hobbs
135 So. 881 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
117 So. 334, 96 Fla. 390, 1928 Fla. LEXIS 861, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-estate-of-walter-n-helveston-fla-1928.