In re Estate of Vitale
Opinion
The appeal is from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Queens County, dated July 26, 1978, which denied William Cerrone’s motion, brought pursuant to SCPA 809, inter alia, for leave to commence an action or proceeding on a fiduciary’s surety bond. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. We agree with the Surrogate that an action directly on the surety bond is not warranted under these circumstances (see United States v Westchester Fire Ins. Co., 478 F2d 133, 138; see, also, 10A Cox-Arenson-Medina, NY Civ Prac, Dec., 1978 Cum Supp, § 809.01, p 74). The creditor’s remedy is to seek the appointment of a successor administrator, c. t. a., pursuant to SCPA 1418, and, upon such appointment, to commence a proceeding pursuant to SCPA 2102 (subd 4). Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Rabin and Mangano, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
68 A.D.2d 928 (In re Estate of Vitale) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.