In re: Estate of Van Putten v. n

553 F. App'x 328
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 31, 2014·No. 13-2119·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Petition dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Allen Van Putten and Debra Van Put-ten, the executor and alternate executor of the estate of Sharon Van Putten, respectively, petition this court for a writ of mandamus directing the district court to accept the estate’s complaint, grant the estate leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), and appoint the estate counsel. The executors have also applied to proceed IFP in this court, representing that the estate is without funds to pay the filing fee. We deny the estate’s request to proceed IFP, as “only a natural person may qualify for treatment in forma pauperis under [28 U.S.C.] § 1915 [ (2012) ],” Rowland v. Calif. Men’s Colony, 506 U.S. 194, 196, 113 S.Ct. 716, 121 L.Ed.2d 656 (1993), and accordingly dismiss the estate’s petition for a writ of mandamus.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Estate of Van Putten v. n, 553 F. App'x 328 (4th Cir. 2014).

553 F. App'x 328 (In re: Estate of Van Putten v. n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related