In Re Estate of Tyler

Ohio Supreme Court

In Re Estate of Tyler

43 N.E.2d 265, 140 Ohio St. 333, 140 Ohio St. (N.S.) 333, 23 Ohio Op. 546, 1942 Ohio LEXIS 450

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 29, 1942

Docket28897

StatusPublished

This text of 43 N.E.2d 265 (In Re Estate of Tyler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Estate of Tyler, 43 N.E.2d 265, 140 Ohio St. 333, 140 Ohio St. (N.S.) 333, 23 Ohio Op. 546, 1942 Ohio LEXIS 450 (Ohio 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.

During the oral argument of this case upon its merits counsel for appellees directed the attention of the court to the fact that the record con *335 tained no bill of exceptions. Leave was granted counsel for appellant to perfect the record. Subsequently a supplemental record was filed containing the motion to dismiss the appeal to tbo Court of Appeals, the petition to reinstate the appeal in that court, with exhibits consisting of correspondence, and another copy of the -former transcript of docket and journal entries in the Court of Appeals. Thereafter counsel for appellees filed a motion to affirm the judgment entered by the Court of Appeals on September 29, 1941, on the ground that a bill of exceptions was necessary for a review.

As there is no bill of exceptions showing what was before the Court of Appeals in the way of evidence or admissions of counsel, this court is unable to determine the basis upon which the Court of Appeals refused to reinstate the appeal in that court.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed

Judgment affirmed.

'Weygandt, C. J., Turner, Williams, Matthias, Hart and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

During the oral argument of this case upon its merits counsel for appellees directed the attention of the court to the fact that the record con *335 tained no bill of exceptions. Leave was granted counsel for appellant to perfect the record. Subsequently a supplemental record was filed containing the motion to dismiss the appeal to tbo Court of Appeals, the petition to reinstate the appeal in that court, with exhibits consisting of correspondence, and another copy of the -former transcript of docket and journal entries in the Court of Appeals. Thereafter counsel for appellees filed a motion to affirm the judgment entered by the Court of Appeals on September 29, 1941, on the ground that a bill of exceptions was necessary for a review.

As there is no bill of exceptions showing what was before the Court of Appeals in the way of evidence or admissions of counsel, this court is unable to determine the basis upon which the Court of Appeals refused to reinstate the appeal in that court.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed

Judgment affirmed.

'Weygandt, C. J., Turner, Williams, Matthias, Hart and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

43 N.E.2d 265, 140 Ohio St. 333, 140 Ohio St. (N.S.) 333, 23 Ohio Op. 546, 1942 Ohio LEXIS 450, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-estate-of-tyler-ohio-1942.