In re Estate of Tyler

543 So. 2d 1307, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1323, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2992, 1989 WL 55984
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 31, 1989
DocketNo. 89-0239
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 543 So. 2d 1307 (In re Estate of Tyler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Estate of Tyler, 543 So. 2d 1307, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1323, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2992, 1989 WL 55984 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal of a non-final order granting Centerre Trust Company of St. Louis’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction over the person. We affirm.

The “formal notice” given to Centerre by the Estate of Julia Tyler pursuant to section 731.301(l)(a) was insufficient to obtain jurisdiction over Centerre concerning its activities as co-trustee. See In re Estate of Black, 528 So.2d 1316 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988).

Further, there is no jurisdiction pursuant to Florida’s Long Arm Statute. The complaint does not allege that Centerre was “conducting business” within the state as [1308]*1308required by section 48.193(l)(a), Florida Statutes (1987). Nor is there jurisdiction pursuant to section 48.193(l)(f)l because the complaint does not allege that Centerre was engaged in “solicitation” within the state. Lastly, the complaint fails to establish jurisdiction over a person “committing a tortious act within this state” pursuant to section 48.193(l)(b). Although the complaint alleges that Centerre breached its fiduciary duty to the estate, it fails to allege that any injury has yet occurred in Florida. The will provides that the situs of the trust is St. Louis, the location of the corporate trustee. Although all of the assets of the trust are as yet in Florida, there is no allegation that there has been a diminution of those assets at this time. Thus, there are insufficient allegations on which to establish jurisdiction pursuant to section 48.193(l)(b). See Phillips v. Orange Company, 522 So.2d 64 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988); International Harvester Company v. Mann, 460 So.2d 580 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).

AFFIRMED.

WALDEN, GUNTHER and GARRETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

The Sampson Farm Limited Partnership v. Parmenter
238 So. 3d 387 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
Posner v. Essex Insurance Company
178 F.3d 1209 (Eleventh Circuit, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
543 So. 2d 1307, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1323, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2992, 1989 WL 55984, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-estate-of-tyler-fladistctapp-1989.