In re Estate of Sommer

199 A.D.2d 273, 605 N.Y.S.2d 945, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11275
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 6, 1993
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 199 A.D.2d 273 (In re Estate of Sommer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Estate of Sommer, 199 A.D.2d 273, 605 N.Y.S.2d 945, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11275 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

In a proceeding to open and vacate the final settlement of the estate of Sigmund Sommer, deceased, the petitioners Viola Sommer and Jack Sommer appeal (1) from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Nassau County (Harrington, S.), dated April 25, 1991, which awarded to the guardian ad litem interim fees and disbursements in the amount of $430,000, (2) from an order of the same court, dated October 22, 1991, which awarded to the guardian ad litem interim fees and disbursements in the amount of $108,000, (3) from an order of the same court, dated August 26, 1992, which awarded to the guardian ad litem interim fees and disbursements in the amount of $160,000, and (4), as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the same court, dated February 11, 1993, as awarded to the guardian ad litem interim fees of $50,000.

Ordered that the orders dated April 25, 1991, October 22, 1991, and August 26, 1992, are affirmed, and the order dated February 11, 1993, is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs payable by the appellants personally.

The Surrogate’s Court, in its discretion, awarded to the guardian ad litem interim fees and disbursements. In the interests of judicial economy, it deferred the fixation of the guardian ad litem’s final compensation until the termination of this proceeding (see, SCPA 2111; Matter of Walters, 102 Misc 2d 130), and stated that, at that time, it would consider evidence of the criteria set forth in Matter of Potts (213 App Div 59) and Matter of Freeman (40 AD2d 397, affd 34 NY2d 1). We find no basis to disturb the interim awards for compensation and disbursements. Mangano, P. J., Sullivan, O’Brien and Ritter, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Estate of Kaufman
288 A.D.2d 222 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Huber v. Mones
243 A.D.2d 633 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
199 A.D.2d 273, 605 N.Y.S.2d 945, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-estate-of-sommer-nyappdiv-1993.