In re Estate of Smiley

Colorado Court of Appeals

In re Estate of Smiley

4 Colo. App. 582

DecidedApril 15, 1894

StatusPublished

This text of 4 Colo. App. 582 (In re Estate of Smiley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Colorado Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Estate of Smiley, 4 Colo. App. 582 (Colo. Ct. App. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

Thomson, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

There is nothing in this record which can he the subject of review. John S. Gibons was appointed by the county court administrator of Kezia C. Smiley, deceased. Shortly after his appointment, two of the heirs at law of the deceased petitioned the eohrt for his removal; and such proceedings were had in the case,' that upon a final hearing judgment of removal was entered against him. From this judgment he appealed to the district court, where, upon motion of the petitioners, the appeal was dismissed, and the cause remanded to the county court. The administrator has brought the case here by appeal from the judgment of the district court dismissing the appeal from the county court. No exception was preserved to the judgment, or to any ruling or decision of the court, and there is therefore no question before us for determination. Breen v. Richardson, 6 Colo. 605; Rutter v. Shumway, 16 Colo. 95; National Bank v. McCaskill, 16 Colo. 408.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thomson, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

There is nothing in this record which can he the subject of review. John S. Gibons was appointed by the county court administrator of Kezia C. Smiley, deceased. Shortly after his appointment, two of the heirs at law of the deceased petitioned the eohrt for his removal; and such proceedings were had in the case,' that upon a final hearing judgment of removal was entered against him. From this judgment he appealed to the district court, where, upon motion of the petitioners, the appeal was dismissed, and the cause remanded to the county court. The administrator has brought the case here by appeal from the judgment of the district court dismissing the appeal from the county court. No exception was preserved to the judgment, or to any ruling or decision of the court, and there is therefore no question before us for determination. Breen v. Richardson, 6 Colo. 605; Rutter v. Shumway, 16 Colo. 95; National Bank v. McCaskill, 16 Colo. 408.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 Colo. App. 582, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-estate-of-smiley-coloctapp-1894.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack