In re Estate of Sinovcic
86 A. 917, 80 N.J. Eq. 260, 10 Buchanan 260, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 367
Opinion
The decree appealed from will he affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in -the Camden county orphans court by Judge Joline.
For affirmance—The Ciuee-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Tbenchaed, Parker, Bergen, Voorhees, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Bogert, Yredenburgh, Yroom, Congdon, White, Treacy—15.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Estate of Sinovcic, 86 A. 917, 80 N.J. Eq. 260, 10 Buchanan 260, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 367 (N.J. 1912).
86 A. 917 (In re Estate of Sinovcic) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dickerson v. Camden Trust Co.
53 A.2d 225 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1947)
Lommason v. the Washington Trust Co.
47 A.2d 323 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1946)
In re Estate of Vealie
38 A.2d 449 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1944)
Diamantopoulos v. Glekas
11 F.2d 200 (District of Columbia, 1926)
Chryssikos v. Demarco
107 A. 358 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1919)