Home/California Supreme Court/In re Estate of Scott

In re Estate of Scott

15 Cal. 220
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1860
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 15 Cal. 220 (In re Estate of Scott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Estate of Scott, 15 Cal. 220 (Cal. 1860).

Opinion

Baldwin, J. delivered the opinion of the Court

Cope, J. concurring.

The petition for a mandamus is denied. The Probate Court of Santa Clara had jurisdiction, of which it could not divest itself, and vest the jurisdiction in the Probate Court of San Francisco county, upon the facts in the record.

These proceedings for the settlement of an estate, and matters connected therewith, are not civil actions within the meaning of the Practice Act, secs. 18 to 21. The Judge of the Probate Court of San Francisco county was right in remanding the cause to the Probate Court of Santa Clara; who will proceed to act in the premises as if no order for the removal of the papers and the matter had been made.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dow v. Lillie
144 N.W. 1082 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1914)
In re Estate of Harris
3 Coffey 1 (California Superior Court, San Francisco County, 1908)
State ex rel. Eakins v. District Court of the Second Judicial District
85 P. 1022 (Montana Supreme Court, 1906)
In re the Estate of Joseph
50 P. 768 (California Supreme Court, 1897)
Territory of Washington v. Klee
23 P. 417 (Washington Supreme Court, 1890)
Carpenter v. Superior Court of San Joaquin Cty.
19 P. 174 (California Supreme Court, 1888)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 Cal. 220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-estate-of-scott-cal-1860.