In re Estate of Scheidig

District Court of Appeal of Florida

In re Estate of Scheidig

180 So. 2d 675

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 7, 1965

DocketNo. G-264

StatusPublished

This text of 180 So. 2d 675 (In re Estate of Scheidig) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Estate of Scheidig, 180 So. 2d 675 (Fla. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a final order entered by the county judge of Volusia County dismissing appellant’s petition for assignment of dower in the estate of Ludwig Scheidig, deceased. The order of dismissal was entered after appellant introduced evidence in support of her claim, and after she had rested her case.

Appellant’s petition for dower is predicated upon the claim that she was the common-law wife of Ludwig Scheidig at the time of his death. The issue raised by her petition involved a mixed question of law and fact. The evidence adduced by appellant was unconvincing and susceptible of the inference that no common-law marriage was consummated between her and the decedent. From our review of the record we fail to find where appellant has clearly demonstrated error. The order appealed is accordingly affirmed.

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., CARROLL, DONALD K., J., and W. L. FITZPATRICK, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a final order entered by the county judge of Volusia County dismissing appellant’s petition for assignment of dower in the estate of Ludwig Scheidig, deceased. The order of dismissal was entered after appellant introduced evidence in support of her claim, and after she had rested her case.

Appellant’s petition for dower is predicated upon the claim that she was the common-law wife of Ludwig Scheidig at the time of his death. The issue raised by her petition involved a mixed question of law and fact. The evidence adduced by appellant was unconvincing and susceptible of the inference that no common-law marriage was consummated between her and the decedent. From our review of the record we fail to find where appellant has clearly demonstrated error. The order appealed is accordingly affirmed.

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., CARROLL, DONALD K., J., and W. L. FITZPATRICK, Associate Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

180 So. 2d 675, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-estate-of-scheidig-fladistctapp-1965.