In re Estate of Schaaf

152 N.E.2d 177, 78 Ohio Law. Abs. 167, 7 Ohio Op. 2d 23, 1956 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 321
CourtOhio Probate Court of Franklin County
DecidedAugust 7, 1956
DocketNo. 167009
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 152 N.E.2d 177 (In re Estate of Schaaf) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Probate Court of Franklin County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Estate of Schaaf, 152 N.E.2d 177, 78 Ohio Law. Abs. 167, 7 Ohio Op. 2d 23, 1956 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 321 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1956).

Opinion

OPINION

By WALCUTT, J.

May Schaaf died testate in Marion Township, Franklin County, Ohio, on July 6, 1955.

In the inventory and appraisal of her estate there is listed 250.84 acres of land in Marion Township, Franklin County, Ohio. In the application for transfer of real estate and in the application to determine inheritance tax the interest of May Schaaf is shown to be an undivided one-half.

In the application to determine inheritance tax there is set up, among the debts, a note signed by May Schaaf, the decedent, and Daniel J. Schaaf, her husband, in the amount of $60,000.00, secured by mortgage on the real estate hereinbefore referred to.

In the determination of the inheritance tax the amount of the indebtedness on this note and mortgage was reduced by one-half, apparently on the ground that the husband and surviving spouse was liable for the payment of one-half. The full claim of $60,000.00 had been allowed as a proper claim against the estate by the executor.

Exceptions to the determination of the inheritance tax were filed by the executor on the ground that the estate was entitled to a deduction of the full amount of the indebtedness of $60,000.00.

After listening to the statements and arguments of counsel, the Court believes that the executor is entitled to the deduction of the full amount, $60,000.00, from the gross estate.

At the same time the estate has a claim against the surviving spouse, Daniel J. Schaaf, for contribution of one-half of the amount due if the estate were compelled to bear the full burden of the debt, and that claim constituting an asset of the estate, should be listed as $30,000.00.

[168]*168The exceptions are sustained, after the addition to the assets of the estate of the amount of the claim against the surviving spouse, who is a co-maker of the note and who joined in the mortgage securing the obligation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Estate of Green
181 N.E.2d 332 (Ashtabula County Probate Court, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
152 N.E.2d 177, 78 Ohio Law. Abs. 167, 7 Ohio Op. 2d 23, 1956 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 321, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-estate-of-schaaf-ohprobctfrankli-1956.