In re Estate of Sager

District Court of Appeal of Florida

In re Estate of Sager

171 So. 2d 580

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 25, 1964

DocketNos. 5210, 5211

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 171 So. 2d 580 (In re Estate of Sager) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Estate of Sager, 171 So. 2d 580 (Fla. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This matter is before the court on motion in both estates to dismiss on the grounds that the order on objections to final accounting is not a final judgment.

The orders appealed from require the Executor in the Estate of Rosella M. Sager, deceased, and the Administratrix de bonis non in the Estate of Dwight E. Sager to file an inventory of the assets of both estates and to file amended final return in each estate. Said order further provides that all interested parties shall have thirty days after the filing of such inventory and amended accounting to file their objections to the same. Such orders, by the terms thereof, are not final in that the county judge’s court retains jurisdiction. F.S.A. § 732.15.

Accordingly, the motions to dismiss in both cases are granted.

SMITH, C. J., and SHANNON and ANDREWS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This matter is before the court on motion in both estates to dismiss on the grounds that the order on objections to final accounting is not a final judgment.

The orders appealed from require the Executor in the Estate of Rosella M. Sager, deceased, and the Administratrix de bonis non in the Estate of Dwight E. Sager to file an inventory of the assets of both estates and to file amended final return in each estate. Said order further provides that all interested parties shall have thirty days after the filing of such inventory and amended accounting to file their objections to the same. Such orders, by the terms thereof, are not final in that the county judge’s court retains jurisdiction. F.S.A. § 732.15.

Accordingly, the motions to dismiss in both cases are granted.

SMITH, C. J., and SHANNON and ANDREWS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

171 So. 2d 580, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-estate-of-sager-fladistctapp-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack