In re Estate of Sadowski

878 N.E.2d 606, 9 N.Y.3d 987, 848 N.Y.S.2d 22, 2007 N.Y. LEXIS 3700
New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 27, 2007·Published

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order dismissing an appeal from a decision, dismissed upon the ground that no motion for leave to appeal lies from an Appellate Division order dismissing an appeal from a decision (see CPLR 5602; Matter of Mixon v Clark, 3 NY3d 688 [2004]); motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order denying a motion for reconsideration or, in the alternative, leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, dismissed upon the ground that such order does not finally determine the [988]*988proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for a stay dismissed as academic.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Estate of Sadowski, 878 N.E.2d 606, 9 N.Y.3d 987, 848 N.Y.S.2d 22, 2007 N.Y. LEXIS 3700 (N.Y. 2007).

878 N.E.2d 606 (In re Estate of Sadowski) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In THE MATTER OF MIXON v. Clark
818 N.E.2d 651 (New York Court of Appeals, 2004)