In re Estate of Rogers

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Estate of Rogers

39 A. 1109, 185 Pa. 428, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 735

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 11, 1898

DocketAppeal, No. 429

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 39 A. 1109 (In re Estate of Rogers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Estate of Rogers, 39 A. 1109, 185 Pa. 428, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 735 (Pa. 1898).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Curiam,

Undoubtedly it was for the best interest of the estate of the decedent that the decree of sale of the property in question should be made. It is perfectly clear also that the power of sale conferred upon the executors and trustees by the will of the testator was amply sufficient to justify the sale by them. It em[437]*437braced the whole of the testator’s real estate of which this property was a part, and the learned court below was entirely right in granting the order.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Curiam,

Undoubtedly it was for the best interest of the estate of the decedent that the decree of sale of the property in question should be made. It is perfectly clear also that the power of sale conferred upon the executors and trustees by the will of the testator was amply sufficient to justify the sale by them. It em[437]*437braced the whole of the testator’s real estate of which this property was a part, and the learned court below was entirely right in granting the order.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

39 A. 1109, 185 Pa. 428, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 735, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-estate-of-rogers-pa-1898.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack