In Re Estate of Raymond

34 N.E.2d 821, 66 Ohio App. 428, 20 Ohio Op. 385, 1940 Ohio App. LEXIS 865
Ohio Court of Appeals·Decided October 7, 1940·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Carpenter, J.

This was a special proceeding under Section 10506-67 et seq., G-eneral Code, by an executrix to recover possession of a cluster diamond ring and some antique dishes. The defendant claimed that they were given to her by decedent. The trial court sustained her claim, and this court cannot say that judgment was manifestly against the weight of the evidence.

The executrix claimed decedent was insolvent when the gift was made, and she offered evidence on that issue which the trial court excluded. There having been a gift of these articles, there was no concealment of them nor were they conveyed away as charged in the complaint. The issue of insolvency of decedent was not before the court any more than was mental incapacity in Goodrich, Admr., v. Anderson, 136 Ohio St., 509, 26 N. E. (2d), 1016.

Judgment affirmed.

Overmyer and Lloyd, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Estate of Raymond, 34 N.E.2d 821, 66 Ohio App. 428, 20 Ohio Op. 385, 1940 Ohio App. LEXIS 865 (Ohio Ct. App. 1940).

34 N.E.2d 821 (In Re Estate of Raymond) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Matter of Haas, 07ap-512 (12-27-2007)
2007 Ohio 7011 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2007)
Lauerman v. Destocki
622 N.E.2d 1122 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1993)