In Re Estate of Ploetz

243 N.W. 383, 186 Minn. 395, 1932 Minn. LEXIS 907
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided June 24, 1932·No. No. 29,020.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This will contest is here on attempted appeal from an order of the district court, made when the case was there called for trial, dismissing the appeal of Bertha Otting, proponent, to the district court from the order of the probate court denying probate of the supposed will.

Under the statute, G. S. 1923 (2 Mason, 1927) § 89S8, the appeal from the probate court to the district court stood for trial de novo *396 in tlie latter tribunal. The mere order of dismissal there was not appealable. Graham v. Conrad, 66 Minn. 470, 69 N. W. 215; Thompson v. Berg, 151 Minn. 560, 187 N. W. 703. If appellant wanted review here of that decision, our procedure required either a motion for a new trial or the entry of judgment of dismissal. In the one case an appeal could be taken from the order denying a new trial, and in the other from the judgment.

Respondent’s motion to dismiss the appeal must be granted.

So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Estate of Ploetz, 243 N.W. 383, 186 Minn. 395, 1932 Minn. LEXIS 907 (Mich. 1932).

243 N.W. 383 (In Re Estate of Ploetz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gabel v. Ferodowill
95 N.W.2d 101 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1959)
Grier v. Estate of Grier
89 N.W.2d 398 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1958)
In Re Estate of Kees
285 N.W. 836 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1939)