In re Estate of Pinkerton

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Estate of Pinkerton

44 A. 424, 193 Pa. 275, 1899 Pa. LEXIS 1114

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 23, 1899·No. Appeal, No. 8·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

We have no doubt as to the substantial correctness of the learned auditor’s conclusions, and especially his construction of [279]*279Robert Pinkerton’s will. The court below was clearly right in dismissing exceptions and confirming the auditor’s report.

There appears to be nothing in either of the specifications of error that requires special notice.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at appellant’s costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

We have no doubt as to the substantial correctness of the learned auditor’s conclusions, and especially his construction of [279]*279Robert Pinkerton’s will. The court below was clearly right in dismissing exceptions and confirming the auditor’s report.

There appears to be nothing in either of the specifications of error that requires special notice.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at appellant’s costs.

In re Estate of Pinkerton, 44 A. 424, 193 Pa. 275, 1899 Pa. LEXIS 1114 (Pa. 1899).

Pincite

44 A. 424 (In re Estate of Pinkerton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related