In Re: Estate of Peter J. Caruso
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
IN RE: ESTATE OF PETER J. CARUSO, III : No. 43 WAL 2023 GERALDINE CARUSO :
: : Petition for Allowance of Appeal v. : from the Order of the Superior Court : :
SANDRA CARUSO, EXECUTRIX OF THE : ESTATE OF PETER J. CARUSO, III :
: :
PETITION OF: SANDRA A. CARUSO :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 21st day of August, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
Where a non-party to a partnership agreement is not a signatory to the agreement and is not a third-party beneficiary of it and where a partnership agreement does not permit assignment, whether the Court’s review is necessary to clarify the circumstances where a non-party could be permitted to “step into the shoes” of a party to an agreement and to enforce contractual rights as if that individual were a party to the agreement.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re: Estate of Peter J. Caruso (In Re: Estate of Peter J. Caruso) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.