In re Estate of Pennell

539 So. 2d 13, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 571, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 961, 1989 WL 16127
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 1, 1989
DocketNo. 87-1891
StatusPublished

This text of 539 So. 2d 13 (In re Estate of Pennell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Estate of Pennell, 539 So. 2d 13, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 571, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 961, 1989 WL 16127 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. We find no abuse of discretion by the trial court in authorizing the sale of property by the personal representative. The decedent’s will expressly granted the representative authority to sell. See § 733.613(2), Fla.Stat. (1987). In addition, there is evidence in the record indicating that the representative acted in good faith and that the terms of the sale were reasonable, even in comparison to the offer alleged by the appellant to be higher in price. See Gilden v. Harris, 197 Md. 32, 78 A.2d 167 (1951).

HERSEY, C.J., and ANSTEAD and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gilden v. Harris
78 A.2d 167 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
539 So. 2d 13, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 571, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 961, 1989 WL 16127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-estate-of-pennell-fladistctapp-1989.