In re Estate of Murphy

39 A. 70, 184 Pa. 310, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 895
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 3, 1898·No. Appeal, No. 178·Published·Cited by 15 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

We find nothing in this record that requires a reversal or modification of the decree from which this appeal was taken; nor do we think that any of the questions presented in the specifications of error require further notice than is taken of them in the opinion of the learned judge who entered the decree.

On his opinion, the decree is affirmed and appeal dismissed at appellants’ costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Estate of Murphy, 39 A. 70, 184 Pa. 310, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 895 (Pa. 1898).

39 A. 70 (In re Estate of Murphy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Callahan Estate
59 Pa. D. & C.2d 756 (Delaware County Court of Common Pleas, 1972)
In Re Kuebler
254 A.2d 115 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1969)
Fairview Cemetery Co. v. Kingsley
254 A.2d 115 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1969)
Thompson Will
206 A.2d 21 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1965)
Funk Estate
45 A.2d 67 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1945)
Funk's Estate
46 Pa. D. & C. 667 (Philadelphia County Orphans' Court, 1942)
Robinson v. Hammel
121 P.2d 200 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1942)
M. D. Thatcher Estate Co. v. Commissioner
38 B.T.A. 336 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1938)
Jordan's Estate
197 A. 150 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1938)
Hartman's Estate (No. 2)
182 A. 232 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1935)
Busser v. Snyder
128 A. 80 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1924)
Thompson's Estate
127 A. 446 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1924)
Busser v. Snyder
5 Pa. D. & C. 84 (Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas, 1924)
Dulles's Estate
67 A. 49 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1907)