In re Estate of Mason

Ohio Supreme Court

In re Estate of Mason

826 N.E.2d 312, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1513

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 26, 2005

Docket2004-1974

StatusPublished

This text of 826 N.E.2d 312 (In re Estate of Mason) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Estate of Mason, 826 N.E.2d 312, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1513 (Ohio 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Hancock App. No. 5-04-01, 2004-Ohio-6544. This cause in pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. On November 29, 2004, appellant/eross-appellee filed a notice that a motion to certify a conflict was pending in the court of appeals and, pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(A), this court stayed consideration of the jurisdictional memoranda filed in this appeal. Whereas appellant/eross-appellee has neither notified this court that the court of appeals determined that a conflict does not exist as provided by S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(B) nor filed a copy of the court of appeals’ order certifying the existence of a conflict as provided by S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(C),

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that appellant/eross-appellee show cause within ten days of the date of this entry why this court should not proceed to consider the jurisdictional memoranda in this appeal pursuant to S.CtPrac.R. 111(6).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hancock App. No. 5-04-01, 2004-Ohio-6544. This cause in pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. On November 29, 2004, appellant/eross-appellee filed a notice that a motion to certify a conflict was pending in the court of appeals and, pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(A), this court stayed consideration of the jurisdictional memoranda filed in this appeal. Whereas appellant/eross-appellee has neither notified this court that the court of appeals determined that a conflict does not exist as provided by S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(B) nor filed a copy of the court of appeals’ order certifying the existence of a conflict as provided by S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(C),

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that appellant/eross-appellee show cause within ten days of the date of this entry why this court should not proceed to consider the jurisdictional memoranda in this appeal pursuant to S.CtPrac.R. 111(6).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

826 N.E.2d 312, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1513, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-estate-of-mason-ohio-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack