In re Estate of Mason

826 N.E.2d 312, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1513
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 26, 2005·No. 2004-1974·Published

Opinion

Hancock App. No. 5-04-01, 2004-Ohio-6544. This cause in pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. On November 29, 2004, appellant/eross-appellee filed a notice that a motion to certify a conflict was pending in the court of appeals and, pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(A), this court stayed consideration of the jurisdictional memoranda filed in this appeal. Whereas appellant/eross-appellee has neither notified this court that the court of appeals determined that a conflict does not exist as provided by S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(B) nor filed a copy of the court of appeals’ order certifying the existence of a conflict as provided by S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(C),

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that appellant/eross-appellee show cause within ten days of the date of this entry why this court should not proceed to consider the jurisdictional memoranda in this appeal pursuant to S.CtPrac.R. 111(6).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Estate of Mason, 826 N.E.2d 312, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1513 (Ohio 2005).

826 N.E.2d 312 (In re Estate of Mason) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Green v. Touraji, Unpublished Decision (12-8-2004)
2004 Ohio 6544 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2004)