In re Estate of Marrey

3 P. 896, 65 Cal. 287, 1884 Cal. LEXIS 523
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedMay 28, 1884
DocketNo. 8,590
StatusPublished
Cited by21 cases

This text of 3 P. 896 (In re Estate of Marrey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Estate of Marrey, 3 P. 896, 65 Cal. 287, 1884 Cal. LEXIS 523 (Cal. 1884).

Opinion

McKinstry, J.

The appeal of the executor from the decree of settlement and distribution must be dismissed. He cannot in any case litigate the claim of one legatee as against the others at the expense of the estate. (Bates v. Ryberg, 40 Cal. 463.)

A fortiori when he himself is the legatee whose claim he is attempting to maintain, at the expense of the estate, in his capacity of executor.

Appeal dismissed.

Morrison, C. J., Ross, J., Sharpstein, J., and Myrick, J., concurred.

Thornton, J., dissented.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Estate of Kessler
196 P.2d 559 (California Supreme Court, 1948)
Linton v. Walker
196 P.2d 559 (California Supreme Court, 1948)
Byrd v. Shell
168 S.E. 692 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1933)
Williams v. Babb
252 P. 1039 (California Supreme Court, 1927)
In Re the Estate of Parsell
213 P. 40 (California Supreme Court, 1923)
Castle v. Irwin
25 Haw. 786 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1921)
Braeuel v. Reuther
193 S.W. 283 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1917)
Hebrew Home for Aged Disabled v. Friedman
153 P. 918 (California Supreme Court, 1915)
Rice v. Carey
151 P. 135 (California Supreme Court, 1915)
Murphy v. O'Connor
78 P. 960 (California Supreme Court, 1904)
Bruning v. Golden
64 N.E. 657 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1902)
Paget v. Brogan
55 S.W. 938 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1900)
Firebaugh v. Burbank
53 P. 560 (California Supreme Court, 1898)
Olmstead v. Buss
52 P. 804 (California Supreme Court, 1898)
Jones v. Lamont
50 P. 766 (California Supreme Court, 1897)
In re Phillips' Estate
45 P. 222 (Montana Supreme Court, 1896)
Ruggles v. Welch
39 P. 805 (California Supreme Court, 1895)
Henry v. Superior Court
29 P. 230 (California Supreme Court, 1892)
In re Dewar's Estate
10 Mont. 422 (Montana Supreme Court, 1891)
In re Jessup
22 P. 260 (California Supreme Court, 1889)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 P. 896, 65 Cal. 287, 1884 Cal. LEXIS 523, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-estate-of-marrey-cal-1884.