IN RE: Estate of Lillie Mae Porter - Concurring

CourtCourt of Appeals of Tennessee
DecidedMarch 30, 2000
DocketE1999-00194-COA-R3-CV
StatusPublished

This text of IN RE: Estate of Lillie Mae Porter - Concurring (IN RE: Estate of Lillie Mae Porter - Concurring) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
IN RE: Estate of Lillie Mae Porter - Concurring, (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

I N T HE C OU RT OF A P P E A L S OF T E N N E S S E E

A T K N OX V I L L E F IL E D Ma rch 30, 2000

C e cil C ro ws on , J r. A p p e l la t e C o u r t C l e rk

I N RE: ) E 1 9 9 9 - 0 0 1 9 4 - C OA - R 3 - C V E S T A T E OF L I L L I E MA E ) P OR T E R. ) ) ) ) ) A P P E A L A S OF R I G HT F R OM T HE ) L OU DON C OU NT Y P R OB A T E C OU RT ) A P P L I C A T I ON OF A T T O RN E Y S ) MA R Y K A T HE R I N E L ON GWOR T H ) a n d P E G GY J . S . MON GE R , F O R ) FEES AND EXPENSES, ) ) HONORA BL E WI L L I A M H. RUS S E L L , Appl i ca nt s - Appel l ant s . ) J U DG E

For Appel l ant s For Appel l ee s Ted L . Por t er and S h i r l e y P o r t e r Wh e e l e r

MA R Y K A T HE R I N E L ON GWOR T H J E S S D. C A MP B E L L P E G G Y J . S . MO NGER C a mp b e l l & Da w s o n Loudon, Tenne s s ee Knoxv i l l e, Tenne s s ee

For Appel l ee Es t at e of J ohn Ker l ey

RUF US W. BE A ME R, J R. Knoxv i l l e, Tenne s s ee

O P IN IO N

1 V A C A T E D A N D R E MA N DE D Sus ano, J.

Thi s ca s e i nv ol v es an a ppl i ca t i on i n pr obat e f or t he

f e e s a n d e x p e ns e s o f a t t o r n e y s Ma r y K a t h e r i n e L on g wo r t h a nd Pe g g y

J . S . Mo ng e r ( “ t h e At t o r n e y s ” ) a r i s i n g ou t o f t h e i r r e p r e s e n t a t i o n

o f T h o ma s S . Ha r v e y , t h e f o r me r e x e c u t o r o f t h e E s t a t e o f L i l l i e

Ma e P or t e r ( “ t h e Es t a t e ” ) . Be i n g di s s a t i s f i e d wi t h t h e pr o b a t e

c o ur t ’ s a wa r d , t h e At t o r n e y s a p p e a l e d . F o r t h e r e a s o ns s t a t e d

h e r e i n , we v a c a t e t h e j u dg me n t o f t h e l o we r c o u r t a n d r e ma n d f o r

f ur t her pr oce edi ngs .

We a r e f a c e d wi t h a di s p u t e r e g a r d i n g a t t o r n e y ’ s f e e s

a n d e x p e n s e s a l l e g e d l y i n c u r r e d i n c o n n e c t i o n wi t h t h e

a d mi n i s t r a t i o n o f t h e E s t a t e . Ms . P o r t e r ’ s 1 9 9 0 wi l l a p p o i n t e d

a t t o r n e y E d wi n H. A r n o l d e x e c u t o r o f t h e E s t a t e . A 1993 codi ci l

t o t hat wi l l r e mo v e d A r n o l d a s e x e c u t o r a n d d e s i g n a t e d Ms .

P o r t e r ’ s s o n , T h o ma s S . Ha r v e y ( “ t h e P r o p o n e n t ” ) t o s e r v e i n h i s

pl ac e. The Pr oponent e mp l o y e d t h e A t t o r n e y s t o r e p r e s e n t t he

Es t at e. T h e r e w e r e t wo l a w s u i t s , o n e i n c i r c u i t c o u r t a n d o n e i n

c h a n c e r y c o u r t , a n d ma n y p r o c e e d i n g s , i n c l u d i n g a p r i o r a p p e a l ,

t o u c h i n g u p o n t h e v a l i d i t y a n d e f f i c a c y o f t e s t a me n t a r y d o c u me n t s

a l l e g e d l y s i g n e d b y Ms . P o r t e r . Ul t i ma t e l y , a j u r y i n c i r c u i t

c o u r t f o u n d t h e 1 9 9 0 wi l l v a l i d , b u t d e t e r mi n e d t h a t t he 1993

c o d i c i l wa s i n v a l i d . The Pr oponent wa s r e mo v e d a s e x e c u t o r o f

t h e E s t a t e a n d A r n o l d q u a l i f i e d t o a d mi n i s t e r t h e E s t a t e .

Wh e n t h e A t t o r n e y s mo v e d i n t h e i n s t a n t ca s e t o r ec ov er

t h e i r f e e s a n d e x p e ns e s f r o m t h e Es t a t e , b e ne f i c i a r i e s u n de r t h e

2 1 1 9 9 0 wi l l - - T e d L . P o r t e r , S h i r l e y P o r t e r Wh e e l e r , a n d J o h n

K e r l e y , wh o a r e t h e t wo s t e p c h i l d r e n a n d b r o t h e r r e s p e c t i v e l y o f

Ms . P or t e r ( c o l l e c t i v e l y “ t h e Co nt e s t a n t s ” ) - - o bj e c t e d t o t h e i r

appl i ca t i on. Af t er a be nch t r i al , t he c our t bel ow awar ded t he

A t t o r n e y s $ 3 2 , 0 0 0 , wh i c h i s o n l y a p o r t i o n o f t h e r e q u e s t e d

a mo u n t , a n d t a x e d h a l f o f t h e a wa r d t o t h e E s t a t e a n d t h e o t h e r

hal f t o t he Pr oponent i ndi v i dual l y . The At t or ney s appe al ,

r a i s i n g wh a t a r e e s s e n t i a l l y t wo i s s u e s :

1. Di d t h e p r o b a t e c o u r t e r r i n f a i l i n g t o a wa r d t h e At t o r n e y s t h e i r e n t i r e c l a i m o f $41, 986?

2. Di d t h e p r o b a t e c o u r t e r r i n t a x i n g o n l y h a l f o f t h e a wa r d t o t h e E s t a t e ?

T he a p pe l l e e s , T e d L . P or t e r , S h i r l e y P o r t e r Wh e e l e r , and t he 2 Es t at e of J ohn Ker l ey , r ai s e a n i s s ue on a ppea l , ques t i oni ng

wh e t h e r t h e At t o r n e y s c a n p u r s u e a d i r e c t cl ai m agai nst t he

Es t a t e .

I . B a c k g r o u nd

On S e p t e mb e r 1 4 , 1 9 9 0 , Ms . P o r t e r p u r p o r t e d l y e x e c u t e d

h e r l a s t wi l l a n d t e s t a me n t . T h e w i l l wa s p r e p a r e d b y a L o u d o n ,

T e nn e s s e e , l a w f i r m. Wh e n p r o ba t e d , i t wa s a c c o mp a ni e d by a n

a f f i d a v i t o f a t t e s t a t i o n p r e p a r e d c o n t e mp o r a n e o u s l y wi t h t h e

wi l l . U n d e r t h e p r o v i s i o n s o f t h e 1 9 9 0 wi l l , t h e P r o p o n e n t wa s

1 T e d L . P o r t e r a n d S h i r l e y P o r t e r Wh e e l e r a r e a l s o b e ne f i c i a r i e s u n de r t h e 19 93 c od i c i l . 2 Du r i n g t h e c o u r s e o f t h i s l i t i g a t i o n, J o h n Ke r l e y d i e d , a n d h i s est at e wa s s u b s t i t u t e d i n h i s p l a c e .

3 t o r e c e i v e c e r t a i n r e a l p r o pe r t y , a n d t h e r e ma i n de r o f t h e Es t a t e

wa s t o b e d i v i d e d a s f o l l o ws : 2 0 % t o t h e P r o p o n e n t ; 2 0 % t o T e d L .

P o r t e r ; 2 5 % t o S h i r l e y P o r t e r Wh e e l e r ; 2 5 % t o J o h n K e r l e y ; a n d

2 . 5 % e a c h t o Ms . P o r t e r ’ s f o u r s t e p - g r a n d c h i l d r e n . As pr ev i ous l y

i ndi ca t ed, a t t o r n e y E d wi n H. A r n o l d wa s d e s i g n a t e d a s e x e c u t o r o f

t h e E s t a t e u n d e r t h e 1 9 9 0 wi l l .

On S e pt e mb e r 9 , 1 99 3, Ms . P or t e r a l l e g e d l y e x e c u t e d a

c o d i c i l t o t h e 1 9 9 0 wi l l . The 1993 codi ci l does not cha nge t he

di s pos i t i on of t he r ea l pr oper t y t o t he Pr oponent , but does

mo d i f y t h e d i v i s i o n o f t h e r e ma i n d e r o f t h e E s t a t e . The

P r o p o n e n t ’ s s h a r e i n c r e a s e s f r o m 2 0 % t o 5 0 %. The s har e of

S h i r l e y P o r t e r Wh e e l e r d e c r e a s e s f r o m 2 5 % t o 2 0 %, a n d J o h n

K e r l e y ’ s s h a r e i s e l i mi n a t e d . T he c o di c i l d oe s n o t c h a ng e t h e

beque s t s t o Ted L . Por t er and t he s t ep- gr andc hi l dr en. The

codi ci l s ubs t i t ut es t he Pr oponent , i n pl ac e of Ar nol d, as t he

e x e c u t o r o f t h e Es t a t e . T he c o di c i l wa s a l s o a c c o mp a ni e d by a n

a f f i d a v i t o f a t t e s t a t i o n b y t h e wi t n e s s e s t o t h a t i n s t r u me n t .

Ms . P o r t e r d i e d i n N o v e mb e r , 1 9 9 3 . The Pr oponent , as

e x e c u t o r u n d e r t h e 1 9 9 3 c o d i c i l , o f f e r e d t h e 1 9 9 0 wi l l a n d t h e

1993 codi ci l f or pr obat e. The Cont es t ant s f i l ed a cont es t as t o

b o t h i n s t r u me n t s . On A p r i l 2 0 , 1 9 9 5 , t h e P r o b a t e C o u r t c e r t i f i e d

t h e wi l l c o n t e s t t o c i r c u i t c o u r t f o r t r i a l .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
IN RE: Estate of Lillie Mae Porter - Concurring, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-estate-of-lillie-mae-porter-concurring-tennctapp-2000.