In re Estate of Keerl

451 So. 2d 872, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11393
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 20, 1984
DocketNo. 83-1091
StatusPublished

This text of 451 So. 2d 872 (In re Estate of Keerl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Estate of Keerl, 451 So. 2d 872, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11393 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting the personal representative an extension to file an objection to the claim, “even though the statutory time limit [had] expired prior to the filing of the motion for extension.” In re Estate of Sale, 227 So.2d 199, 201 (Fla.1969); see also In re Estate of Oxford, 372 So.2d 1129, 1132 (Fla.2d DCA 1979).

GRIMES, A.C.J., and RYDER and DAN-AHY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Estate of Oxford
372 So. 2d 1129 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
In Re Estate of Sale
227 So. 2d 199 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
451 So. 2d 872, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11393, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-estate-of-keerl-fladistctapp-1984.