In Re Estate of John K. Crawford (No. 2)

165 A. 540, 108 Pa. Super. 477, 1933 Pa. Super. LEXIS 218
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 12, 1933·No. Appeal 148; 2·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The only question involved in this appeal is with reference to the construction to be given the judgment of the Supreme Court in Crawford’s Appeal, 307 Pa. 102, which reversed the decree of the orphans’ court *478 of Venango County and ordered that court to enter a decree awarding the appellant therein, Quincy D. Hastings, “full counsel fee of $10,000/ ’ to wit, whether this carried with it interest on said sum, and if so from what date interest should be computed.

Adopting the suggestion of the Supreme Court in Ladner v. Siegel, 296 Pa. 579, 587, where a judgment or decree of that court was also the subject of consideration, we shall not attempt to pass upon the question raised, but will certify the case to the Supreme Court for decision.

Appeal certified to the Supreme Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Estate of John K. Crawford (No. 2), 165 A. 540, 108 Pa. Super. 477, 1933 Pa. Super. LEXIS 218 (Pa. Ct. App. 1933).

165 A. 540 (In Re Estate of John K. Crawford (No. 2)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ladner v. Siegel
146 A. 710 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1929)
Crawford's Estate
160 A. 585 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1931)