In re Estate of Homan

Missouri Court of Appeals

In re Estate of Homan

207 S.W.3d 131, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1313, 2006 WL 2529685

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 5, 2006·No. No. ED 87089·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Cheryl Lynn Boeckmann, appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, following a hearing on her petition to discover assets in the Estate of Earline Homan (“the Estate”), entered in favor of Respondent, Joseph Homan III. In its judgment, the trial court found, inter alia, that any stock or interest in Orchid Motel, Inc. is not an [132] asset of the Estate and should not be inventoried within the Estate. We affirm.¹

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law appears. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the trial court’s judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Cheryl Lynn Boeckmann, appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, following a hearing on her petition to discover assets in the Estate of Earline Homan (“the Estate”), entered in favor of Respondent, Joseph Homan III. In its judgment, the trial court found, inter alia, that any stock or interest in Orchid Motel, Inc. is not an [132] asset of the Estate and should not be inventoried within the Estate. We affirm.¹

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law appears. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the trial court’s judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Footnotes

In re Estate of Homan, 207 S.W.3d 131, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1313, 2006 WL 2529685 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

207 S.W.3d 131 (In re Estate of Homan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.