In re Estate of Hoffman

39 A. 954, 185 Pa. 315, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 711
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 4, 1898·No. Appeal, No. 314·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per. Curiam,

We are not convinced that the special facts and circumstances of this case did not justify the court below in departing from the ordinary rule, and in disposing of it as shown by the record. A careful consideration of the evidence has satisfied us that the appellant has not been unjustly prejudiced by the action of the court below, and his conduct, as found by the learned president of that court, was not such as should induce us, on any technical ground, to relieve him from the consequences of a decree of which he at least has no just reason to complain.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at appellant’s costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Estate of Hoffman, 39 A. 954, 185 Pa. 315, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 711 (Pa. 1898).

39 A. 954 (In re Estate of Hoffman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Slotkin Estate
40 Pa. D. & C.2d 334 (Philadelphia County Orphans' Court, 1965)
Gaston's Estate
61 Pa. D. & C. 126 (Pike County Orphans' Court, 1947)
Wolfe v. Lewisburg Trust & Safe Deposit Co.
158 A. 567 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1931)
Morrison's Estate
46 A. 257 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1900)