In re Estate of Hatcher

District Court of Appeal of Florida

In re Estate of Hatcher

270 So. 2d 45

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 12, 1972·No. No. S-104·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ON MOTION TO DISMISS

PER CURIAM.

The notice of appeal herein not having been timely filed in the office of the clerk of the correct court, we are obliged to grant appellee’s motion to dismiss on jurisdictional grounds, insofar as the same purports to vest this court with jurisdiction to review the order rendered September 18, 1972, by the County Judge’s Court in and for Gadsden County, Florida, in Case No. 2536, therein lately pending. State v. Carroll, 102 So.2d 129 (Fla.1958).

Dismissed.

SPECTOR, C. J., and RAWLS and JOHNSON, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON MOTION TO DISMISS

PER CURIAM.

The notice of appeal herein not having been timely filed in the office of the clerk of the correct court, we are obliged to grant appellee’s motion to dismiss on jurisdictional grounds, insofar as the same purports to vest this court with jurisdiction to review the order rendered September 18, 1972, by the County Judge’s Court in and for Gadsden County, Florida, in Case No. 2536, therein lately pending. State v. Carroll, 102 So.2d 129 (Fla.1958).

Dismissed.

SPECTOR, C. J., and RAWLS and JOHNSON, JJ„ concur.

In re Estate of Hatcher, 270 So. 2d 45 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

270 So. 2d 45 (In re Estate of Hatcher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related