Home/California Supreme Court/In re Estate of Hamilton

In re Estate of Hamilton

6 P. 493, 66 Cal. 576, 1885 Cal. LEXIS 506
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedApril 9, 1885
DocketNo. 9,972
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 6 P. 493 (In re Estate of Hamilton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Estate of Hamilton, 6 P. 493, 66 Cal. 576, 1885 Cal. LEXIS 506 (Cal. 1885).

Opinion

The Court

When Mrs. Hamilton, widow of the deceased, became the wife of Mr. Dale, she was no longer the widow of the deceased, and was no longer entitled to have maintenance out of the estate as such. The order of allowance to her, there[577]*577tofore made, terminated at her second marriage, without the further order of the court. There are no minor children, and therefore no question as to the maintenance of such children. Doubtless the court below can, upon final distribution, treat as advances to Mrs. Dale the amounts improperly paid to her, and have the same deducted from her distributive share.

The orders appealed from are affirmed.

Hearing in Bank denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Estate of Murphy
225 Cal. App. 2d 224 (California Court of Appeal, 1964)
Murphy v. Wells Fargo Bank
225 Cal. App. 2d 224 (California Court of Appeal, 1964)
Jackson v. United States
317 F.2d 821 (Ninth Circuit, 1963)
United States Nat. Bank of Portland v. United States
188 F. Supp. 332 (D. Oregon, 1960)
Estate of Edward A. Cunha, Deceased, Bank of America, National Trust and Savings Association v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
279 F.2d 292 (Ninth Circuit, 1960)
Estate of Rensenhouse v. Commissioner
31 T.C. 818 (U.S. Tax Court, 1959)
Estate of Blair
269 P.2d 612 (California Supreme Court, 1954)
Bonnen v. Ruoff
269 P.2d 612 (California Supreme Court, 1954)
Samson v. Neumann
7 N.W.2d 60 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1942)
Rosborough v. Houston
270 P. 939 (California Supreme Court, 1928)
In re Estate of Newell
1 Cal. Super. Ct. 125 (California Superior Court, 1923)
In Re Estate of Treat
121 P. 1003 (California Supreme Court, 1912)
Webb v. Still
49 P. 463 (California Supreme Court, 1897)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 P. 493, 66 Cal. 576, 1885 Cal. LEXIS 506, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-estate-of-hamilton-cal-1885.