In re Estate of Gurney

543 So. 2d 846, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1220, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2650, 1989 WL 50224
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 17, 1989·No. Nos. 4-86-0623, 4-86-2238, 4-86-2371 and 4-86-2957·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find no merit in any of the points raised by appellant in the main appeal, therefore, the orders of the trial court are affirmed as to those issues.

As to the points on the cross appeal, we also affirm as to the first two points raised. However, we reverse and remand as to the trial court’s failure to award costs in connection with the removal proceedings. In the court’s order of February 19, 1986, the court clearly found entitlement to legal fees and costs in paragraph 6 and reserved jurisdiction to determine the amounts thereof. It was thus error for the court to subsequently deny those costs in its order of November 12, 1986.

The cause is reversed and remanded for proceedings consistent herewith.

DELL, POLEN and GARRETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Estate of Gurney, 543 So. 2d 846, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1220, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2650, 1989 WL 50224 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

543 So. 2d 846 (In re Estate of Gurney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Black v. BEDFORD AT LAKE CATHERINE ASS'N, INC.
801 So. 2d 252 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)