In re Estate of Griffith
24 P. 381, 84 Cal. 107, 1890 Cal. LEXIS 770
Opinions
Upon the argument of this case in Bank we are satisfied with the decision heretofore rendered in Department as correct, and the same will stand as the decision of the court.
Order affirmed.
So ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Estate of Griffith, 24 P. 381, 84 Cal. 107, 1890 Cal. LEXIS 770 (Cal. 1890).
24 P. 381 (In re Estate of Griffith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Estate of Buckley
132 Cal. App. 3d 434 (California Court of Appeal, 1982)
Preston v. Wyoming Pacific Oil Co.
197 Cal. App. 2d 517 (California Court of Appeal, 1961)
Stevens v. Torregano
192 Cal. App. 2d 105 (California Court of Appeal, 1961)
Estate of Brace
180 Cal. App. 2d 797 (California Court of Appeal, 1960)
Heathman v. Vant
343 P.2d 104 (California Court of Appeal, 1959)
Hart v. Gudger
314 P.2d 549 (California Court of Appeal, 1957)
Pietro v. Pietro
305 P.2d 916 (California Court of Appeal, 1957)
Eistrat v. Brush Industrial Lumber Co.
305 P.2d 715 (California Court of Appeal, 1957)
Burch v. Hibernia Bank
304 P.2d 212 (California Court of Appeal, 1956)
Hogan v. Hogan
280 P.2d 64 (California Court of Appeal, 1955)
Smith v. Busniewski
251 P.2d 697 (California Court of Appeal, 1952)
People v. Egan
167 P.2d 766 (California Court of Appeal, 1946)
Rogers v. Mulkey
147 P.2d 62 (California Court of Appeal, 1944)
Westphal v. Westphal
126 P.2d 105 (California Supreme Court, 1942)
Ivory v. Callaghan
98 P.2d 761 (California Court of Appeal, 1940)
Harris v. Schoonmaker
58 P.2d 415 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1936)
County of Los Angeles v. Superior Court
18 P.2d 112 (California Court of Appeal, 1933)
Oil Well Supply Co. v. Cremin
1930 OK 122 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1930)
Holabird v. Superior Court
281 P. 108 (California Court of Appeal, 1929)
Knowles v. Kasiska
268 P. 3 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1928)