In re Estate of Griffin

118 A.D. 515, 103 N.Y.S. 345, 1907 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 706

This text of 118 A.D. 515 (In re Estate of Griffin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Estate of Griffin, 118 A.D. 515, 103 N.Y.S. 345, 1907 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 706 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).

Opinion

Kellogg, J.:

By the inventory the appraisers, in Schedule A, set off to the widow the specific items of personal property as directed by subdivisions 1 to 4 of section 2713 of the Code of Civil Procedure. In Schedule B they set off to her the remaining household furniture of the value of $28.40, and not finding enough furniture to make up $150 added $137.60 of value in cows and other property. By Schedule 0, under subdivision 5 of the section, they set off to her $150 of other property. The creditors, at the making of. the inventory and upon the accounting, contended that the $137.60 in Schedule B was assets to be accounted for by the administrator and could not properly be set off for the widow. The surrogate held the appraisement proper and gave the administrator credit for the amount. Subdivision 4 of the section, which directs the appraisers to set off other household furniture not exceeding $150 in value, is relied upon to sustain the action of the appraisers and the surro[516]*516gate. The ■ language ■ of the statute is plain, and the most liberal construction of its provisions cannot bring cows and property of that class under the head of household furniture. (Jfatter of Bibolt, 102 App. Div. 29 ; Bauous v. Stover, 24 Hun, 109.)

In the other schedules- the widow was allowed all the property provided for by the statute, and this $131.60 was assets and should be administered as such.

The final order of the surrogate is, therefore, reversed, without costs, and the matter is remitted to that court for further action.

All concurred.

Decree reversed, without costs, and the matter remitted to the" Surrogate’s Court for further action. ■

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Transfer Tax on the Estate of Libolt
102 A.D. 29 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
118 A.D. 515, 103 N.Y.S. 345, 1907 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-estate-of-griffin-nyappdiv-1907.