In re Estate of Galbraith

Hawaii Supreme Court

In re Estate of Galbraith

18 Haw. 660

CourtHawaii Supreme Court

DecidedMay 29, 1907

DocketNo. 84

StatusPublished

This text of 18 Haw. 660 (In re Estate of Galbraith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Estate of Galbraith, 18 Haw. 660 (haw 1907).

Pincite

Opinion

The executors filed their account crediting themselves with $530 paid to a surety company as a premium on their bond as executors. The master recommended that they be surcharged as to this item; the executors excepted;.the circuit judge overruled the exception. The executors appealed. Per curiam: The item [661]*661was properly disallowed and tire decree is affirmed. See L8 Cyc. 285 and eases there cited, — also Adamson v. Parker, 85 S. W. (Ark.) 239.

Smith & Lewis and O. II. Olson for the execiitors. Holmes & Stanley and Ballou & Marx for the heirs and legal representatives of deceased heirs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The executors filed their account crediting themselves with $530 paid to a surety company as a premium on their bond as executors. The master recommended that they be surcharged as to this item; the executors excepted;.the circuit judge overruled the exception. The executors appealed. Per curiam: The item [661]*661was properly disallowed and tire decree is affirmed. See L8 Cyc. 285 and eases there cited, — also Adamson v. Parker, 85 S. W. (Ark.) 239.

Smith & Lewis and O. II. Olson for the execiitors. Holmes & Stanley and Ballou & Marx for the heirs and legal representatives of deceased heirs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 Haw. 660, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-estate-of-galbraith-haw-1907.