In re Estate of Friedman

191 So. 2d 310, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 4508
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 1, 1966·No. No. 66-53·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By this appeal a legatee who was. a daughter of the decedent seeks reversal of an order of the county judge’s court of Dade County denying her petition for-[311]*311revocation of probate of the decedent’s will. The contention presented by the appellant is that the will was not properly executed. The findings of the county judge that the will was properly signed by the testator, attested and published, are amply supported by the evidence. Under the established rule that such a decision of a probate court will not be disturbed on appeal unless the legal effect of the evidence has been misapprehended or there is a lack of evidence to support the findings, we conclude that no reversible error has been made to appear. See Gair v. Lockhart, Fla. 1950, 45 So.2d 193; Skelton v. Davis, Fla.App.1961, 133 So.2d 432, 89 A.L.R.2d 1114; In re Winans’ Estate, Fla.App.1961, 133 So.2d 473.

Accordingly, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Estate of Friedman, 191 So. 2d 310, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 4508 (Fla. Ct. App. 1966).

191 So. 2d 310 (In re Estate of Friedman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Skelton v. Davis
133 So. 2d 432 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1961)
Threm v. Winans
133 So. 2d 473 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1961)