In re Estate of Forand

District Court of Appeal of Florida

In re Estate of Forand

182 So. 2d 278

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 27, 1966·No. No. 217·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

BARNS, PAUL D., Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from 'an order of the County Judge’s Court extending time to the executrix of the estate to file objections to a claim against it of some $7,000.00. The objections were timely filed in the office of the County Judge and on the attorney for the claimant, but not on the claimant-Section 733.18(2), F.S.A.

An order of the County Judge extending, time within which to file objections to a claim is an interlocutory administrative order and is not final and affords no basis, for an appeal. Section 5(3), Article V of the Constitution of Florida, F.S.A. The-case of Smoalc v. Graham, Fla. 1964, 167' So.2d 559, has not escaped our attention.

The appeal is dismissed.

ANDREWS, Acting C. J., and WALDEN, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BARNS, PAUL D., Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from 'an order of the County Judge’s Court extending time to the executrix of the estate to file objections to a claim against it of some $7,000.00. The objections were timely filed in the office of the County Judge and on the attorney for the claimant, but not on the claimant-Section 733.18(2), F.S.A.

An order of the County Judge extending, time within which to file objections to a claim is an interlocutory administrative order and is not final and affords no basis, for an appeal. Section 5(3), Article V of the Constitution of Florida, F.S.A. The-case of Smoalc v. Graham, Fla. 1964, 167' So.2d 559, has not escaped our attention.

The appeal is dismissed.

ANDREWS, Acting C. J., and WALDEN, J., concur.

In re Estate of Forand, 182 So. 2d 278 (Fla. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

182 So. 2d 278 (In re Estate of Forand) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related