In Re Estate of Emily W Ash Adult Ward

Court of Appeals of Georgia

In Re Estate of Emily W Ash Adult Ward

DecidedMay 14, 2026

DocketA26D0483

StatusPublished

This text of In Re Estate of Emily W Ash Adult Ward (In Re Estate of Emily W Ash Adult Ward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Estate of Emily W Ash Adult Ward, (Ga. Ct. App. 2026).

Pincite

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ May 14, 2026

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A26D0483. IN RE ESTATE OF EMILY W ASH ADULT WARD.

On April 27, 2026, Millan Ash filed this application for discretionary review of the trial court’s February 25, 2026 order denying Ash’s “Emergency Motion to Set Aside Final Order and to Preserve the Status Quo.” An application for discretionary review must be filed within 30 days of entry of the order to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-35(d). This statutory deadline is jurisdictional, and we cannot accept an application for appeal not made in compliance with it. Boyle v. State, 190 Ga. App. 734, 734 (380 SE2d 57) (1989). Because Ash filed this application 61 days after entry of the order Ash seeks to appeal, it is untimely and is hereby DISMISSED.1

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 05/14/2026 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

1 Although Ash apparently filed a timely notice of direct appeal of the order in the trial court, this case is subject to the discretionary application procedure — which requires that an application be filed in the appellate court within 30 days of entry of the order — because Ash’s “Emergency Motion” sought relief under OCGA § 9-11- 60(d). See OCGA § 5-6-35(a)(8), (d); Jim Ellis Atlanta v. Adamson, 283 Ga. App. 116, 116-17 (640 SE2d 688) (2006). Further, although Ash refers to orders entered by the trial court on March 27 and 30, 2026, Ash’s application materials do not include copies of any such orders. Finally, Ash’s “Motion to Supplement and Complete Record,” in which Ask seeks to supplement the record in connection with a transcript, is hereby DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ May 14, 2026

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A26D0483. IN RE ESTATE OF EMILY W ASH ADULT WARD.

On April 27, 2026, Millan Ash filed this application for discretionary review of the trial court’s February 25, 2026 order denying Ash’s “Emergency Motion to Set Aside Final Order and to Preserve the Status Quo.” An application for discretionary review must be filed within 30 days of entry of the order to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-35(d). This statutory deadline is jurisdictional, and we cannot accept an application for appeal not made in compliance with it. Boyle v. State, 190 Ga. App. 734, 734 (380 SE2d 57) (1989). Because Ash filed this application 61 days after entry of the order Ash seeks to appeal, it is untimely and is hereby DISMISSED.1

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 05/14/2026 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

1 Although Ash apparently filed a timely notice of direct appeal of the order in the trial court, this case is subject to the discretionary application procedure — which requires that an application be filed in the appellate court within 30 days of entry of the order — because Ash’s “Emergency Motion” sought relief under OCGA § 9-11- 60(d). See OCGA § 5-6-35(a)(8), (d); Jim Ellis Atlanta v. Adamson, 283 Ga. App. 116, 116-17 (640 SE2d 688) (2006). Further, although Ash refers to orders entered by the trial court on March 27 and 30, 2026, Ash’s application materials do not include copies of any such orders. Finally, Ash’s “Motion to Supplement and Complete Record,” in which Ask seeks to supplement the record in connection with a transcript, is hereby DENIED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

In Re Estate of Emily W Ash Adult Ward, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-estate-of-emily-w-ash-adult-ward-gactapp-2026.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack