In re Estate of Edmunds

District Court of Appeal of Florida

In re Estate of Edmunds

214 So. 2d 65

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 12, 1968·No. No. 1845·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellants attack the probate of a certain Will, saying that the decedent lacked testamentary capacity and that said Will was procured by undue influence. We have examined the record in the light of the respective briefs and find that the probate judge’s rulings are supported by substantial competent evidence and that there is no showing that the probate court judge misapprehended the legal effect of the proofs. In re Kiggins’ Estate, Fla. 1953, 67 So.2d 915; In re Aldrich’s Estate, 1941, 148 Fla. 121, 3 So.2d 856; and Tice v. Cralle, 1921, 81 Fla. 140, 87 So. 314.

WALDEN, C. J., and REED and OWEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellants attack the probate of a certain Will, saying that the decedent lacked testamentary capacity and that said Will was procured by undue influence. We have examined the record in the light of the respective briefs and find that the probate judge’s rulings are supported by substantial competent evidence and that there is no showing that the probate court judge misapprehended the legal effect of the proofs. In re Kiggins’ Estate, Fla. 1953, 67 So.2d 915; In re Aldrich’s Estate, 1941, 148 Fla. 121, 3 So.2d 856; and Tice v. Cralle, 1921, 81 Fla. 140, 87 So. 314.

WALDEN, C. J., and REED and OWEN, JJ., concur.

In re Estate of Edmunds, 214 So. 2d 65 (Fla. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

214 So. 2d 65 (In re Estate of Edmunds) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related