In re Estate of Edmunds

214 So. 2d 65
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 12, 1968
DocketNo. 1845
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 214 So. 2d 65 (In re Estate of Edmunds) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Estate of Edmunds, 214 So. 2d 65 (Fla. Ct. App. 1968).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellants attack the probate of a certain Will, saying that the decedent lacked testamentary capacity and that said Will was procured by undue influence. We have examined the record in the light of the respective briefs and find that the probate judge’s rulings are supported by substantial competent evidence and that there is no showing that the probate court judge misapprehended the legal effect of the proofs. In re Kiggins’ Estate, Fla. 1953, 67 So.2d 915; In re Aldrich’s Estate, 1941, 148 Fla. 121, 3 So.2d 856; and Tice v. Cralle, 1921, 81 Fla. 140, 87 So. 314.

WALDEN, C. J., and REED and OWEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hendley v. Parson
443 So. 2d 458 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
214 So. 2d 65, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-estate-of-edmunds-fladistctapp-1968.