In Re Estate of duPont

982 A.2d 1225

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 5, 2009·No. 181 MAL 2009·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*1226 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

And now, this 5th day of November, 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, which we have reframed for clarity, are:

1. Whether the burden of persuasion is on the party offering, or the party opposing, a motion to modify an order placing documents under seal?

2. Whether the lower courts erred in denying Petitioner’s motion to unseal the records of Respondent’s incapacitation hearing?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*1226 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

And now, this 5th day of November, 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, which we have reframed for clarity, are:

1. Whether the burden of persuasion is on the party offering, or the party opposing, a motion to modify an order placing documents under seal?

2. Whether the lower courts erred in denying Petitioner’s motion to unseal the records of Respondent’s incapacitation hearing?

In Re Estate of duPont, 982 A.2d 1225 (Pa. 2009).

Pincite

982 A.2d 1225 (In Re Estate of duPont) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.